An article in sciencedaly.com, Memories of near death experiences: More real than reality?, explains that memories of near death experience are more like the memories of actual experiences than they are like imagined experiences. However the memories of near-death experiences are more detailed than ordinary memories. This supports what most near-death experiencers say: that their near-death experiences seemed more real than ordinary reality. None of the "scientific" explanations offered by materialists to explain NDE's can account for all aspects of the phenomenon.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I was deep in meditation. I asked, "Is there a plan for my life? What is the plan!?" I heard a voice say "It's in the key of B", and I saw the symbol for a flat in musical notation. The plan for my life is in the key of B flat! I understood this immediately. I have a record of Pete Fountain playing the clarinet. It's a clarinet tuned to the key of B flat. I like to improvise on my guitar along with the record. The plan for my life is: "We're improvising!".
Translate
Posts
Did you know...
Skeptical
claims
are often
wrong or
misleading.
Many
scientists
including Nobel prize winners
have proved some paranormal
phenomena are
genuine. Highly skilled
stage
magicians
have investigated many mediums and have found them to be
genuine.
Studies have shown people with more education are more likely
to believe in the
psychic phenomena
and the
afterlife
, and most medical doctors believe in the
afterlife.
About Me
- anonymous
- Web site:
Spiritual Development
Twitter
Blogs:
- Life in B Flat (Science and Spirituality)
- ncu9np
- Anecdotes in Psychical Research
Contact:
You can contact me at the e-mail address listed on my web site.
Recommended Articles From My Website
Recommended Articles from this Blog
- What to do if You Start Developing Psychic Abilities
- What to do About Unwanted Spirit Contacts
- How to Make a Psi Wheel And Measure Your Energy Field
- A Synthesis of Spiritual Healing and Qi Gong: Learn to Sense Healing Energy with Your Hands
- Mrs. Piper: Proof of Survival After Death
- Super-psi does not Explain the Evidence for the Afterlife
- Consciousness is not Produced by the Brain
- Skepticism, The Big Lie. Activist Skeptics and Atheists are a Danger to the Health and Well Being of Believers.
Recommended Subjects
- ectoplasm (5)
- Getting Rid of Spirits (6)
- mrs piper (2)
- near-death experiences (31)
- near-death.com (2)
- psi wheel (5)
- psychic development (25)
- psychical research (43)
- Qi (5)
- spiritual healing (13)
- super-psi (5)
Free E-Books
Recommended Blogs
Labels
- anatta (8)
- awakening (19)
- Bhante Vimalaramsi (1)
- blogs (11)
- bogus science (2)
- book reviews (1)
- Buddhadasa Bhikkhu (1)
- Buddhism (10)
- Carl Jung (1)
- consciousness (12)
- cosmology (9)
- darwinism (13)
- dean radin (14)
- dependent-origination (1)
- dowsing (1)
- dukkha (1)
- Eben Alexander (6)
- ectoplasm (5)
- ego (1)
- eminent researchers (21)
- evidence for the afterlife (5)
- evolution (22)
- forgiveness (1)
- free e-books (6)
- george chapman (1)
- george orwell (1)
- Getting Rid of Spirits (6)
- God (13)
- gradual awakening (5)
- Guillermo Gonzalez (2)
- hallucinations (5)
- harmful pseudoskepticism (3)
- humor (1)
- hypnogogic state (2)
- identity-view (4)
- intelligent design (21)
- jeffrey long (1)
- Joe McMoneagle (3)
- John Lennox (3)
- journalism (1)
- karl popper (5)
- Leslie Flint (2)
- Lester Levenson (2)
- love (1)
- mario beauregard (4)
- meditation (78)
- melvin morse (1)
- metta (1)
- Michael Singer (1)
- mindfulness (7)
- miscellaneous (2)
- mrs piper (2)
- natural law (1)
- nderf.org (6)
- near-death experiences (31)
- near-death.com (2)
- neuroplasticity (3)
- nirvana (1)
- opinion (6)
- out-of-body experience (1)
- paranormal (1)
- parapsychology (36)
- philosophy (17)
- philosophy of science (9)
- pim van lommel (2)
- podcast (1)
- politics (3)
- practical uses of ESP (2)
- psi wheel (5)
- psychic detective (1)
- psychic development (25)
- psychical research (43)
- psychology (1)
- Qi (5)
- realization (5)
- relaxation (5)
- sasquatch (1)
- self-enquiry (2)
- seven factors of awakening (1)
- skeptical fallacies (16)
- skepticism (50)
- skeptiko podcast (3)
- spiritual healing (13)
- spiritualism (2)
- spirituality (21)
- stream-entry (3)
- super-psi (5)
- technology (1)
- UFOs (8)
- Video (17)
- what it is like in the afterlife (5)
- what kind of people are pseudoskeptics (4)
- Willoughby Britton (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(60)
-
▼
March
(9)
- Memories of near death experiences: More real than...
- Spiritual Practices and their Effectiveness
- Top Five Problems with Current Origin-of-Life Theo...
- Life did not Arise Through the Unguided Action of ...
- Proof and Possibility
- Materialism is not a Rational Philosophy
- What to do about Unwanted Spirit Contact: How to H...
- Interview with Near-Death Researcher Sam Parnia
- Interview with Chris Carter by Jime of Subversive ...
-
▼
March
(9)
RSS/Atom Reader
Followers
Eminent Researchers
Charles Darwin: ... I cannot anyhow be contented to view this wonderful universe, and especially the nature of man, and to conclude that everything is the result of brute force. I am inclined to look at everything as resulting from designed laws, with the details, whether good or bad, left to the working out of what we may call chance.
Kurt Gödel: Materialism is false. ... The world in which we live is not the only one in which we shall live or have lived. ... The brain is a computing machine connected with a spirit. ... I don’t think the brain came in the Darwinian manner. In fact, it is disprovable. ... Mind is separate from matter. ... There are other worlds and rational beings of a different and higher kind.
Alan Turing: I assume that the reader is familiar with the idea of extrasensory perception, and the meaning of the four items of it, viz., telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition and psychokinesis. These disturbing phenomena seem to deny all our usual scientific ideas. How we should like to discredit them! Unfortunately the statistical evidence, at least for telepathy, is overwhelming. It is very difficult to rearrange one's ideas so as to fit these new facts in. Once one has accepted them it does not seem a very big step to believe in ghosts and bogies. The idea that our bodies move simply according to the known laws of physics, together with some others not yet discovered but somewhat similar, would be one of the first to go.
Max Planck (Nobel Prize for Physics): I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.
Erwin Schrödinger (Nobel Prize for Physics): Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else.
Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize for Physics): On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble
...
I believe in Spinoza's God, Who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.
Brian D. Josephson (Nobel Prize for Physics): What are the implications for science of the fact that psychic functioning appears to be a real effect? These phenomena seem mysterious, but no more mysterious perhaps than strange phenomena of the past which science has now happily incorporated within its scope.
Charles Robert Richet (Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine): 1. There is in us a faculty of cognition that differs radically from the usual sensorial faculties (Cryptesthesia). 2. There are, even in full light, movements of objects without contact (Telekinesis). 3. Hands, bodies, and objects seem to take shape in their entirety from a cloud and take all the semblance of life (Ectoplasms). 4. There occur premonitions that can be explained neither by chance nor perspicacity, and are sometimes verified in minute detail. Such are my firm and explicit conclusions.
Pierre Curie (Nobel Prize for Physics): It was very interesting, and really the phenomena that we saw appeared inexplicable as trickery—tables raised from all four legs, movement of objects from a distance, hands that pinch or caress you, luminous apparitions. All in a [setting] prepared by us with a small number of spectators all known to us and without a possible accomplice. The only trick possible is that which could result from an extraordinary facility of the medium as a magician. But how do you explain the phenomena when one is holding her hands and feet and when the light is sufficient so that one can see everything that happens?
Sir John Eccles (Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine): I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as a superstition ... we have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains existing in a material world.
(3/14)